A lot of things have been going on since last week and this all should be a good summary of it :
Did Malaria cause the Fall of Rome?
There has never been any real proof of Malaria having been present at all in the Roman Empire. While there are several mentions of a disease sounding very similar to
malaria in historical documents from Roman times, there has never been
any hard evidence of its presence.
But last year, for the first time, a British scientist proved
conclusively that the most dangerous type of malaria was a killer in
imperial Rome. The scientist relied on the latest DNA techniques that
are revolutionizing the understanding of the role of disease in ancient
times.
The malarial DNA from a Roman site, dating from around AD 450, is
the oldest definite evidence of malaria in history. The finding of
malaria was a remarkable and complicated piece of detective work, which
spanned the last ten years.
At its height, the Roman Empire stretched from Scotland in the
northern hemisphere to the deserts of Africa in the south. The empire
lasted for over 500 years, although its eastern part, the Byzantine
Empire, lasted for several more centuries. When the empire collapsed,
hordes of barbarian armies, including the infamous Vandal pirates,
invaded Italy throughout the fifth century AD. Rome was transformed from
a bustling city of millions to a provincial town of a few thousand,
surrounded by swamps.
The anarchy of the Dark Ages had begun.
Although there has been no shortage of theories, it has never been
clear why Rome became so vulnerable to foreign invaders at this time.
Political instability, the collapse of food supplies to Rome, and even
the infamous lead in the water supplies have all been implicated.
Historians have generally agreed that Rome's downfall was due to a
combination of many factors.
More information can be found in this BBC-History article Malaria and the Fall of Rome
The Great Pyramid's Secret Doors to be opened in 2012:
|
The Great Pyramid of Egypt, secrets to be revealed |
Might sound a bit prophetical with it being opened in 2012 but worry not, chances of doomsday are slim-to-none!
Back to the story here:
New revelations on the enduring mystery were already expected this year, following a robot exploration of the 4,500-year-old pharaonic mausoleum.
But unrest in Egypt froze the project at its most promising stage, after it produced the first ever images behind one of the Great Pyramid's mysterious doors.
Now the Supreme Council of Antiquities (SCA), once led by the controversial yet charismatic Zahi Hawass, is slowly returning to granting permits for excavations and archaeological research.
"As with other missions, we have had to resubmit our application to be allowed to continue. We are currently waiting for the various committees to formalize the approval," project mission manager Shaun Whitehead, of the exploration company Scoutek UK, told Discovery News.
"Once we're allowed to continue, I have no doubt that we can complete our work in 2012," he added.
Built for the pharaoh Cheops, also known as Khufu, the Great Pyramid is the last remaining wonder of the ancient world.
The monument is the largest of a family of three pyramids on the Giza plateau, on the outskirts of Cairo, and has long been rumored to have hidden passageways leading to secret chambers. Archaeologists have long puzzled over the purpose of four narrow shafts deep inside the pyramid since they were first discovered in 1872.
Two shafts, extend from the upper, or "Kings Chamber" exit into open air. But the lower two, one on the south side and one on the north side in the so-called "Queen's Chamber" disappear within the structures, deepening the pyramid mystery.
To those interested, the full story is here - Will The Great Pyramid's secrets be finally revealed?
5000 Year Old Burial Sites Discovered in Sohar, Oman:
|
The 600km sq burial site |
At least 5,000 year old burial sites have been discovered by
archaeologists during the two-year-long Sohar Heritage Project,
according to a press release from the Ministry of Heritage and Culture
on Sunday (the 11th).
The ministry-run project, which has carried out major survey
within Sohar town and surrounding areas, is mainly funded by the
industrial sector in the this port town.
"An area of 600sqkm has been covered and many new sites have been
found that will shed light on Oman and its glorious past," informs to
Biubwa Ali Al Sabri, Director of Excavation and Archaeological Sites at
the Ministry of Heritage and Culture.
She added that many of the sites found in Sohar are burial sites
belonging to the Wadi Souq period (1900- 1100 BC). "Also older sites
that are as old as 5000 years have been found and a distinctive pattern
can be seen within the area that stretches from Liwa to Gyal as Shabol,"
pointed out the Omani archaeology expert.
"Many Islamic sites have also been
found that have the potential to shed light of how Sohar has come to
develop. Also other surveys have been conducted over the years in the
area but not in this scale," Al Sabri added.
"This will also be something that can be used in other projects
within and outside the Ministry of Heritage and Culture as a base for
future development of Omani heritage," said Swedish Project manager
Gunnar Ohrnell.
More information and background here - 5,000 year old burial sites found in Oman
Dead Sea Was Almost Dried Up 120,000 years ago:
|
The Dead Sea, clearly labelled |
The Dead Sea nearly disappeared about 120,000 years ago, say
researchers who drilled more than 1,500 feet below one of the deepest
parts of the politically contentious body of water.
The discovery looms large at a time when the Dead Sea is shrinking
rapidly, Middle Eastern nations are battling over water rights, and
experts hotly debate whether the salt lake could ever dry up completely
in the years to come.
New data from drilled deposits are also helping piece together
geological history that slices through Biblical times. Further research
may offer opportunities to verify whether earthquakes destroyed the
cities of Sodom and Gomorrah or if Joseph stockpiled grains in Egypt to
weather a real famine.
"We see a lot of these different stories in the Bible about fat years
and lean years," said Steven Goldstein, a geochemist at Columbia
University in New York. "And we can see in the record that there were
these intervals where it looks like it was a land of milk and honey, and
there were intervals where there was no water, no rain and I'm sure,
famine. Climate validates that there were these rhythms."
The new research started, not as an attempt to investigate Biblical
events, but to understand the history of the Dead Sea, which has been
drying up at dramatic rates in recent decades.
As a result of both
evaporation and intensive human demands for water from inflowing rivers,
the surface of the lake dropped 23 meters (75 feet) from 1930 to 2000,
said Emi Ito, a geochemist at the University of Minnesota, Twin Cities.
And the lake's rate of shrinking seems to be accelerating. From 2000
to 2008, levels dropped 8 m (26 feet), with another 1.5 m (5 feet) lost
in 2010 alone.
Even as the lake's salty shores recede, though, scientists have long
debated whether it could ever totally dry up. Because the water is so
salty and because salt and water molecules attract each other, many
modeling studies have suggested that some amount of water will always
remain there.
To see if history could help settle that debate and
others, an international team of researchers drilled down about 460 m
(more than 1,500 feet) into sediments of the Dead Sea in Israeli
territory at a spot that was just slightly shallower than the lake's
deepest point, which lay on the other side of the border in Jordan. The
cores they pulled up stretched back 200,000 years.At a level
corresponding with 120,000 years ago, during a warm period between ice
ages, the researchers found a layer of small round pebbles sitting on
top of 45 meters (nearly 150 feet) of thick salt deposits. Those
pebbles, they announced this week at a meeting of the American
Geophysical Union in San Francisco, look just like the rocks that
normally appear on the lake's beaches -- suggesting that one of the
deepest parts of the lake was once dry.
More Information here - A Dry Dead Sea Before Biblical Times
Enigmatic standing stele of Al-Rajajil
Perhaps the equivalent of Stonehenge, this unusual structure is believed to be the oldest human monument in the whole Arabian Peninsula
In the Jawf province of Saudi Arabia, outside of Sakkaka lies this three metre high fingers of stone.
Etched with ancient Thamudic graffiti, these
monuments to a long extinct culture have maintained their lonely vigil
for six millennia. Many have fallen over and others lean at bizarre
random angles.
Al-Rajajil (“the men”), the sandstone stele
weighing up to five tons each, is popularly called Saudi Arabia’s
Stonehenge. They are possibly the oldest human monuments on the
peninsula.
Some time in the Chalcolithic, or Copper Age, people
living in the area where Al-Jouf is today laboriously erected 54 groups
of rudely trimmed stone pillars. Each group contains two to 19 pillars.
At
ground level there is no immediately obvious placement of the groups.
However, aerial images suggest a rough alignment to sunrise and sunset.
There is no positive answer to the question why they are there. An
archaeological dig over 30 years ago at the base of one set of pillars
failed to turn up any bones or votive offerings, suggesting that
religious motives were not the reason.
Political or astronomical reasons are a possibility, though not proven. It is possible that is a landmark for a trade route.
Al-Jouf
was a significant stopover point on the trade route from Yemen to
Mesopotamia. One trade route, the oldest land route in recorded history,
ran from Yemen and parallel to the Red Sea coast through Madinah,
Al-‘Ula and Madaen Salih. It turned northeast to Al-Jouf and then north
toward Damascus and Turkey.
The Arabian Peninsula and Saudi
Arabia in particular has hugely rich archaeological wealth. Much can be
definitively written into history, but the standing stele of Al-Rajajil
remains an enigma.
London was built with the Blood of British Slaves ?
Long has it been believed that the Romans founded London (then Londinium) in AD 50 as a centre of trade and business in its empire...or so we thought.
|
The skulls that were uncovered, belonged to the Iceni tribe |
Recent evidence suggests the capital has a more chilling history, built as a military
base by slaves who were then slaughtered. Hundreds of skulls discovered
along the course of the "lost" river Walbrook suggest London may have
been built by forced labour.
Dominic Perring, director of the
Centre for Applied Archaeology at University College London, says the
skulls could be those of Queen Boudica's rebel Iceni tribesmen who were
brought to London to build a new military base.
In an essay
published in this month's British Archaeology magazine, Mr Perring
argues that some of the skulls had been de-fleshed, which suggests the
slaves may have been executed after building work was finished.
Mike
Pitts, the editor of British Archaeology, said:
"At a time when we're
all wondering and worrying about the future of the City of London it's
interesting to reflect on its foundation, which seems to have been very
bloody indeed.
"The team has been looking at the evidence
accumulated from decades of new excavation, and they offer a more
convincing, and chilling, alternative to what has long been believed."
Mr
Perring added:
"The timbers were prepared using 'native' British
woodworking techniques, unlike the Roman carpentry used everywhere else.
Might this have been the work of forced labour? Several hundred late
Iron Age or early Roman skulls, from a population that must have
numbered in thousands, have been found in and around the Walbrook and
were predominantly of young males. London's civic centre was ignored in
the rebuilding, and no new temples or basilicas were erected. This
suggests London lacked independent legal status and remained under
direct military control.
"It was singled out for attention in the
period after the revolt because of its military importance, as both the
site of an earlier fort and the principal port that supplied the army.
This was the commanding centre from which Roman power in Britain was
exercised."
And that sums up this week's post. Come back next week!
Update: A worthy mention for any Romanophiles out there, The University of Arizona published a paper (its actually someone's thesis) on
Private Armies and Personal Power in the Late Roman Empire (written by Ryan H. Wilkonson